Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11579 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"Direct the learned Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) Court/ Room No. 08, Allahabad to decide the case bearing application 6C Under Order 39 Rule 1, 2 read with Section 151 C.P.C. arising out of O.S. No. 1219 of 2024 (Chandrajeet Yadav vs. Smt. Khatuna Devi) pending before Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) Court/Room No. 8 Allahabad, expeditiously within a stipulated period."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) Court/ Room Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramendra Giri Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Chandrajeet Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Khatuna Devi .....Respondent(s)
No. 08, Allahabad to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 23, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 11579 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad