HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: WP(C) No. 2924/2025 Surinder Nath Chowdhary and Anr. ..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Vastav Sharma, Advocate Vs U.T. of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s) Through :- Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Mr. S.S. Nanda, Sr. AAG for R-1 Mr. Atul Verma, Advocate vice Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate for R – 2 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 18.10.2025 01. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he would feel satisfied, if the instant petition is treated as representation and is disposed of by directing the respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to accord consideration to the case of the petitioners by treating the instant writ petition as representation within some stipulated time. 02. Learned counsels for the respondents submit that they are not averse to the aforesaid preposition, provided the case of the petitioner is directed to be accorded consideration under rules and as per law. 03. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the very threshold and, is accordingly, disposed of by directing the respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to treat the instant writ petition as a representation and to accord consideration within a period of four weeks from the date, a copy of this order as well as copy of the instant writ petition along with the annexure(s) are made available to the said Sr. No. 56 2 | P a g e WP(C) No. 2924/2025 respondent, strictly under rules and as per law. The order of consideration, which is likely to be passed be forwarded to the petitioners by the said respondents through registered post. 04. Thus, the instant writ petition, is accordingly, ‘disposed of’ along with connected application(s) in the manner indicated above. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 18.10.2025 Mihul Mihul Singh 2025.10.18 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document