NANDA BHASKAR DIGHULE v. PALVE SUNIL EKNATH AND OTHERS
CP/196/2020 · 2025-06-11
Shri N B Suryawanshi, Shri Sandipkumar C More
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10003 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10003 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 918 cp 196-20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 196 OF 2020 IN WP/9533/2014 NANDA BHASKAR DIGHULE VERSUS PALVE SUNIL EKNATH AND OTHERS ... Mr. Rudrawar S. G., Advocate for the Petitioner Mrs. U. S. Bhosale, AGP for Respondent-State Mr. Jayabhar Dattatraya R., Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 3 ….
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.
DATED : 11/06/2025.
P. C. :
1. The learned advocate for the petitioner, on instructions, states that the order is complied with. Learned APP confirmed the said position.
2. In view of compliance of the order, contempt petition is
disposed of.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
VS Maind/-