HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33736 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Having heard Sri Vinod Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Mukul Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents, present petition is found to be misconceived inasmuch as no interference may be offered in the recovery proceedings arising under an award made by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. 2. Leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue his remedies in accordance with law, present writ petition is dismissed. October 8, 2025 Mohit Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Udisha Tripathi, Vaibhav Tripathi, Vinod Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar Saxena .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad