Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10001 (CHH)

SAVITRI BAI YADAV (LEGAL HEIR) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1374/2025 · 2025-02-21

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:9226 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1374 of 2025 1 - Savitri Bai Yadav (Legal Heir) W/o Late Aghnu Ram Aged About 50 Years The Widow Of Retired Work Charged Employee, R/o Village Kondkera, Post Kondkera, Tehsil Rajim, District Gariyaband (C.G.). ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Water Resource Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Finance, Accounts And Treasury, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 5 - The Executive Engineer, Water Resource Division Gariyaband, District Gariyabnd (C.G.). ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) 2 / 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Anand Kumar Kujur, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Ajit Singh, Govt. Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 21/02/2025 1. The limited relief that the Petitioner seeks for in the present Writ Petition is for an appropriate direction to the Respondents for considering the claim of the Petitioner for grant of leave encashment in terms of the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Work- Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. 2. According to the Petitioner, he has made his claim in the light of the recent decision of this High Court rendered in W.P.(S) No.3870/2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 30.9.2022, wherein similar claim of the Petitioner therein has been allowed. The said decision also stands affirmed by the Division Bench in W.A. No.119/2023, decided on 20.6.2023. 3. Given the said facts, the present Writ Petition is disposed of at this juncture, directing the Respondent Authorities to immediately process the claim of all similarly placed person in the light of the aforesaid decision of this High Court on the same subject-matter, within an outer limit of 120 days from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. 4. With aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar/Shoaib