TARIQ AHMAD MALIK v. FAROOQ AHMAD SHEIKH AND ORS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT)
RP/25/2024 · 2026-09-11
M A Chowdhary, Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Review Petitionbody2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 954 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 954 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
RP 25/2024 in LPA 72/2023 CM(3372/2024).
Tariq Ahmad Malik.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
VERSUS
Farooq Ahmad Sheikh & Ors.
Through: None.
…Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 11.09.2026
1. There is no representation on behalf of the review petitioner and so was the case on the previous dates of hearing as well. It suggests that the review petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the review petition, any further.
2. The review petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non- prosecution, along with the connected application(s).
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) (M. A. CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 11.09.2026 Bisma Jan.
S. No. 01 Suppl-I