Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2024 DAILYLAW 943 (ORI)

TRINATH SAHU v. VIR VIKRAM YADAV, I.A.S.

CONTC/2943/2024 · 2026-02-11

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Contempt Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.2943 of 2024 Trinath Sahu …. Petitioner None -versus- Vir Vikram Yadav, IAS …. Opposite Party Mr. A. Tripathy,AGA CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 11.02.2026 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. None appeared for the Petitioner when the matter was called. 3. Basing on the compliance affidavit, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate contended that vide order at Annexure-A/1 Petitioner’s claim has been considered and compensation has been sanctioned. 4. It is also contended that basing on Annexure-A/1 order, the amount in question has been credited to the account of the Petitioner under Annexure-B/2. 5. Since the order in question has already been complied with, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Jyoti