M/S SNOWMAN ADVENTURES AND ORS. v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT)
WP(C)/895/2024 · 2026-09-08
Rajnesh Oswal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 943 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 943 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP(C) No. 895/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent department, for the last two years, has not been following the impugned
order and, as such, for the time being, nothing survives for adjudication. He, however, seeks liberty for the petitioners to have the present writ petition revived in the event the respondents decide to implement the impugned order.
Disposed of with liberty as prayed for.
WP(C) No. 1237/2024 CM No. 3395/2024
There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last many dates of hearing. The position remains the same today, which shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 08-09-2026
Shameem H. Sr. No.25 Regular List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 895/2024 CM(2401/2024) c/w i)WP(C) 1237/2024 CM(3395/2024)
M/S SNOWMAN ADVENTURES AND ORS.(SENIOR CITIZEN)
…Petitioner(s)/appellant(s) Through: Mr. Arif Sikander, Advocate
Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS.
(REVENUE DEPARTMENT)
...Respondent(s) Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
O R D E R 08-09-2026