Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2024 DAILYLAW 943 (JK)

M/S SNOWMAN ADVENTURES AND ORS. v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT)

WP(C)/895/2024 · 2026-09-08

Rajnesh Oswal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP(C) No. 895/2024 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent department, for the last two years, has not been following the impugned order and, as such, for the time being, nothing survives for adjudication. He, however, seeks liberty for the petitioners to have the present writ petition revived in the event the respondents decide to implement the impugned order. Disposed of with liberty as prayed for. WP(C) No. 1237/2024 CM No. 3395/2024 There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last many dates of hearing. The position remains the same today, which shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE SRINAGAR 08-09-2026 Shameem H. Sr. No.25 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 895/2024 CM(2401/2024) c/w i)WP(C) 1237/2024 CM(3395/2024) M/S SNOWMAN ADVENTURES AND ORS.(SENIOR CITIZEN) …Petitioner(s)/appellant(s) Through: Mr. Arif Sikander, Advocate Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT) ...Respondent(s) Through: None CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE O R D E R 08-09-2026