MOHAMMAD SADIQ QURESHI v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (REVENUE) AND ORS
WP(C)/2883/2024 · 2026-09-08
Sanjay Parihar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 938 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 938 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 40
Regular
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 2883/2024 CM No. (7876/2024) Mohammad Sadiq Qureshi …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs. Union Territory of J&K And Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Nazir Ahmad, CGC
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 08.09.2026
1. For the last four consecutive hearings there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, when the matter was called nobody turned up to represent the petitioner, which suggests that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant matter any further.
2. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution along with all connected CMs.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(SANJAY PARIHAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 08.09.2026 Akhil Dev