Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2024 DAILYLAW 938 (JK)

MOHAMMAD SADIQ QURESHI v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (REVENUE) AND ORS

WP(C)/2883/2024 · 2026-09-08

Sanjay Parihar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S. No. 40 Regular HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) No. 2883/2024 CM No. (7876/2024) Mohammad Sadiq Qureshi …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs. Union Territory of J&K And Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Nazir Ahmad, CGC CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 08.09.2026 1. For the last four consecutive hearings there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, when the matter was called nobody turned up to represent the petitioner, which suggests that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant matter any further. 2. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution along with all connected CMs. 3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (SANJAY PARIHAR) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 08.09.2026 Akhil Dev