Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Subhash vs. Anjeev Kumar
Cr.Revision No. 88 of 2024
15.09.2026 Present: None for the petitioner.
Cr.MP No. 3751 of 2026.
Case repeatedly called, but neither the petitioner nor any representation has been made on his behalf. Prima facie, it appears that the learned counsel is not interested to represent the petitioner; hence, the present application is dismissed.
(Rakesh Kainthla)
Judge
15.09.2026
(ravinder)