SURINDER SINGH v. JAMMU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND ANOTHER
WP(C)/2750/2024 · 2026-08-31
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 922 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 922 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 2750/2024
Surinder Singh .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. G.S. Thakur, Advocate
v/s Jammu Development Authority and Another .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Atul Verma, Advocate
WP (Crl) No. 53/2025
Satya Devi and Another .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through:- None
v/s
UT of J&K and Others .....Respondent(s)
Through: - Ms. Chetna Manhas, Assisting counsel to Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Mr. Atul Verma, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 31.08.2026
WP (C) No. 2750/2024 Mr. G.S. Thakur, learned counsel has stated at Bar that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed by the respondents. In view of the same, building permission has been granted in favour of the petitioner by the Jammu Development Authority on 14.08.2026, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. The sanction order permitting the use of plot is taken on record.
Sr. No. 36
2
WP (Crl) No. 53/2025 On the last date of hearing, i.e., 04.05.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, when the case was taken up, nobody turned up to appear for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is no more interested to pursue this petition. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
JAMMU 31.08.2026 Manik