Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2024 DAILYLAW 922 (JK)

SURINDER SINGH v. JAMMU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND ANOTHER

WP(C)/2750/2024 · 2026-08-31

Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP (C) No. 2750/2024 Surinder Singh .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through :- Mr. G.S. Thakur, Advocate v/s Jammu Development Authority and Another .....Respondent(s) Through :- Mr. Atul Verma, Advocate WP (Crl) No. 53/2025 Satya Devi and Another .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through:- None v/s UT of J&K and Others .....Respondent(s) Through: - Ms. Chetna Manhas, Assisting counsel to Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Mr. Atul Verma, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE ORDER 31.08.2026 WP (C) No. 2750/2024 Mr. G.S. Thakur, learned counsel has stated at Bar that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed by the respondents. In view of the same, building permission has been granted in favour of the petitioner by the Jammu Development Authority on 14.08.2026, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. The sanction order permitting the use of plot is taken on record. Sr. No. 36 2 WP (Crl) No. 53/2025 On the last date of hearing, i.e., 04.05.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, when the case was taken up, nobody turned up to appear for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is no more interested to pursue this petition. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. (Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge JAMMU 31.08.2026 Manik