- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:3657 RSA No. 86 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.86 OF 2022 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. 1a. SRI NARASIMHA MURTHY @ MURTHY SINCE DEAD BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS SMT. NAGAMMA W/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS 1b. SRI. RAJANNA S/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 1c. SRI. NARAYANA S/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 1d. SRI. KUMAR S/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS RESPONDENTS 1(a) TO 1(d) ARE R/AT HUCHANAPALYA DASANAPURA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGAURU URBAN DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SRINIVASA K N., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:3657 RSA No. 86 of 2022 CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN KANDAYA BHAVANA BENGALURU - 560 009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVSION KANDAYA BAHVANA BENGALURU - 560 009. 4. THE TAHASILDAR BENGALURU NORTH TALUK KANDAYA BHAVANA BENGALURU - 560 009. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.03.2020 PASSED IN R.A.NO.20/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NELAMANGALA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.11.2015 PASSED IN OS.NO.162/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:3657 RSA No. 86 of 2022 JUDGMENT 1. This appeal was listed on 08.01.2024 for compliance of office objections. A week's time was granted subject to payment of cost of Rs.1,000/-, making it clear that failing to comply with office objections would result in dismissal of the appeal. Matter was thereafter posted on 16.01.2024. There was no appearance on the said date and office objections had also not been complied with. However, in the interest of justice, another week's time was granted. Accordingly, matter is listed today. 2. Even today neither there is any representation nor office objections have been complied with and cost is also not paid. Thus, despite giving sufficient opportunity, appellants do not seem to have any interest in prosecuting the matter and as such, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17