Sl. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL Cont.Cas(C)No.113 of 2024 Akoijam Chingkheinganbi Devi Petitioner Vs. Vineet Joshi & 8 Ors. Respondents BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA (ORDER) (Order of the Court was made by Mr. M. Sundar, CJ) 26.05.2026 [1] Mr. B. Kirankumar Sharma, learned counsel on record for contempt petitioner is before this Court (physical Court). [2] Mr. Juno Rahman, learned counsel on record for respondent Nos. 1,2,3,8 & 9 and Mr. S. Suresh, learned counsel on record for respondent No.4 are before this Court on the Video Conferencing (V.C.) platform. Mr. W. Niranjit, learned State counsel for respondent No.6 and Mr. Leo N, learned counsel on record for respondent No.7 are before this Court (physical Court). [3] Mr. B. Kirankumar Sharma, learned counsel on record for contempt petitioner submits that there is due compliance i.e., pensionary benefits have since been released and captioned contempt case can be given a closure, saying so learned counsel has made an JOHN TELEN KOM Digitally signed by JOHN TELEN KOM Date: 2026.05.27 16:23:11 +05'30' endorsement in this regard in the case file and a scanned reproduction of the same is as follows: [4] The afore-referred respondents stand discharged from contempt and they stand purged of contempt. [5] In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned contempt case is given a closure i.e., disposed of as closed recording due compliance. There shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE John Kom