SHAHIDA v. UNION TERRITORY THROUGH SHO POLICE STATION GANDERBAL AND ORS. (HOME DEPARTMENT)
CRM(M)/440/2024 · 2026-08-19
Shahzad Azeem
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 906 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 906 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 59 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CrlM(1023/2024) IN CRM(M) 440/2024 CrlM(1024/2024)
Shahida …Appellant(s)\Petitioner(s)
Through: -
None.
V/s
Union Territory of J&K and Ors. … Respondent(s) Through: - Mr. Shubham Kaith, Advocate for R-3 to 10.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
(ORDER) 19.08.2026
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. So was the case on the last three dates of hearing as well. It suggests that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute this case any further. Accordingly, the petition shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution, along with all connected application(s). Interim direction(s), if any, shall stand vacated.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM)
JUDGE SRINAGAR August 19th 2026 Shoaib Javid