IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 1863/2024 Decided on: 01.09.2026 Naresh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate vice Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record office order dated 30.04.2024 and, on that basis, submits that the impugned transfer of the petitioner had been cancelled by the respondents on 27.04.2024 itself, pursuant to which the petitioner was allowed to continue in service at the place where he had been transferred. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner acknowledges the above position and submits that subsequent events have rendered the writ petition infructuous. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 1st September, 2026(rohit)