Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2024 DAILYLAW 884 (KAR)

ANJINAPPA v. THE PANCHYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

RSA/1140/2020 · 2026-08-24

V Srishananda

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2024 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S KAMAL REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1140 OF 2020 BETWEEN: SRI ANJINAPPA SON OF LATE SANNAKARIYANNA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS RESIDING AT J ACHAMMANAHALLI VILLAGE Y.N.HOSAKOTE HOBLI PAVAGADA TALUK 573201 TUMKAURU DISTRICT ...APPELLANT/S (By Sri./Smt : FAYAZ SAB AND RAVI A, ADVOCATES) AND: 1 . THE PANCHYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER J.ACHAMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, Y.N.HOSAKOTE HOBLI PAVAGADA TALUK 573201 TUMAKURU DISTRICT 2 . THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHYATHI SAMITHI PAVAGADA TALUK 573201 TUMAKURU DISTRICT …2 RSA NO. 1140/2020 2 3 . THE CHIEF SECRETARY ZILLA PANCHYATHI TUMAKURU DISTRICT TUMAKURU -572101 4 . THE TAHASILDAR PAVAGADA TALUK PAVAGADA 573101 TUMAKURU DISTRICT 5 . SMT. OBALAMMA WIFE OF CHOWDAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS RESIDING AT J.ACHAMMANAHALLI VILLAGE Y.N.HOSAKOTE HOBLI, PAVAGADA TALUK 573201 TUMAKURU DISTRICT …RESPONDENT/S REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.01.2020 PASSED IN RA NO.45/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PAVAGADA. DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.04.2018 PASSED IN OS NO.122/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PAVAGADA. …3 RSA NO. 1140/2020 3 This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order. ORDER By order dated 24.01.2024 taking note of the non compliance of the office objections and the appeal is of the year 2020, two weeks time was granted subject to payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- making it clear, failing to comply office objections would result in dismissal of the appeal. The matter is listed today. Office objections are not complied, neither the cost is paid. At the request of the learned counsel for the appellant two weeks time is granted to comply the office objections, failing which appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 22.04.2024, office objections are not complied with, hence appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- I/c ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : SR(PKS) R By : RG C By : CDJ Ty Dt : 23.08.2024 C.Dt : 31.08.2024