- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:6108 RFA No. 1486 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1486 OF 2020 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. MRS NEELUFER KHURAISHI W/O LATE MEER SHOEB AHMED KHURAISHI AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 2. MR NAIF KHURAISHI S/O LATE MEER SHOEB AHMED KHURAISHI AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 3. MR ABUZER KHURAISHI S/O LATE MEER SHOEB AHMED KHURAISHI AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS (REP. BY GPA HOLDER HIS MOTHER MRS NEELUFER KHURAISHI) ALL ARE R/AT 1218/1 BIDAR KRISHNAPPA RAMAMANDIRA ROAD DEVARAJA MOHALA MYSURU-570 024. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI.SRIDHAR CHAKKE., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. DR MRS TAJ JAHAN BEGUM W/O SHOUKATH ALI KHAN AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT 68, DREAM MEADOWS ITPL ROAD, 1ST MAIN ROAD 1ST CROSS, A BROOK FIELD BANGALORE-560 037. Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:6108 RFA No. 1486 of 2020 2. MRS NOOR JAHAN BEGUM W/O MR NOOR AHMED MECCI AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS R/AT 1/16, HIBA HANUMANTHYA LAYOUT ULSOOR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 042. 3. MRS SHAH JAHAN BEGUM W/O MR MUJEEB REHAMAN AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS R/AT FLAT 400, 17 LLOYD ROAD COOKS TOWN, BANGALORE-560 005. 4. MRS GUL JAHAN BEGUM W/O MR LATTEF AZAM KHADER AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS C/O MR NOOR AHMED MECCI (PA HOLDER) R/AT 1/16, HIBA HANUMANTHYA LAYOUT ULSOOR ROAD, BANGALORE-560 042. 5. MR MEER HASEEB AHMED KHURAISHI S/O LATE MER BASHEER AHMED KHURAISHI AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT GROUND FLOOR 1218/1, B K STREET DEVARAJA MOHALLA, MYSURU-24. 6. MR MEER IQBAL AHMED KHURAISHI S/O LATE MEER BASHEER AHMED KHURAISHI AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT H-501, TAMBOURINE KANAKAPURA ROAD J P NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 078 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NANDITA K NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KIRAN V RON., ADVOCATE FOR R1: NOTICE NOT ORDERED TO R2 TO R5) - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:6108 RFA No. 1486 of 2020 THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.03.2020 PASSED IN O.S.NO.412/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MYSURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT When the matter was posted before the Registrar for non-compliance of office objections for the fourth time, none appeared for the appellants and the office objections were not complied with. 2. The matter was posted for non-compliance of office objections before the Court on 03.08.2023. On that day, five weeks time was granted for compliance of office objections. Then the matter was posted on 12.02.2024 for sixth time. On that day, none appeared for the appellants and the office objections were not complied with. The matter was ordered to be listed to today at the top of the list under the caption ‘for dismissal’. - 4 - NC: 2024:KHC:6108 RFA No. 1486 of 2020 3. Even today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants in both the sessions and the office objections are not complied with. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 is present. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. 4. The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE CM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1