Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2024 DAILYLAW 871 (ORI)

PRAKASH CHANDRA SETHI v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/15162/2024 · 2026-02-06

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.15162 of 2024 Prakash Chandra Sethi & Ors. …. Petitioners Mr. P.K. Rath, Sr. Advocate -versus- State of Orissa & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr.C.K. Pradhan, AGA Mr. L.K. Moharana, Adv. for TPCODL CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 06.02.2026 13. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “The petitioners, therefore, prays that your Lordships would be graciously pleased to admit this writ petition, call for the records and after hearing the parties allow the same, issue writ /writs in the nature of certiorari / mandamus and /or any other further writ/ direction, directing the Parties Opposite to remove electricity Transformer of 32 (KV) from entrance of the Petitioner's Property standing over Khata No 500, Plot No 1470, under Mouza- Bhubaneswar, Sahar unit No 19, Baramunda under Annexure-1, within a stipulated Period And for this act of kindness, the petitioners shall as in duty bound ever pray.” 4. It is contended that pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 29.10.2025 a report has come from the concerned authirty so available in the case record prescribing the modality for shifting of the Transformer. 5. It is fairly contended in the bar that taking into account the report so prepared, the Writ petition be disposed of with a direction on Opposite Party No.3 to do the needful. 6. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties and considering the submissions made, this Court while disposing the Writ Petition directs Opposite Party No.3 to do the needful in terms of the report, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Subrat Judge