1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1132 of 2024 1 - Cholamandalam M.S. General Insurance Company Limited (Wrongly Mentioned S S/o), Simran Tower Second Floor, In Front Of Lic Building, Pandari, Raipur, Tahsil And District - Raipur (C.G.), District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Lushan Kumar Yadav S/o Lt. Madan Lal Yadav, Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Deori-B, Post Vinayakpur, Tahsil Gunderdehi, District Balod, (C.G.) 2 - Lukeshwar Prasad Yadav S/o Lt. Madan Lal Yadav, Aged About 26 Years Village Deori-B, Post Vinayakpur, Tahsil Gunderdehi, District-Balod, Chhattisgarh, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ramavtar Thakur S/o Panchkod Thakur, Aged About 34 Years Saja Police Station And Tahsil Gunderdehi, District-Balod, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Jasvinder Singh Dhanoba, S/o Harjeet Singh Dhanba, Aged About 57 Years Kanji Kuti Bhandar, Mohan Nagar, Durg Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 and 2 : Ms. Vartika Shrivastava, Advocate SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2026.06.25 18:08:26 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 25.06.2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the present writ petition arising out of the rejection of the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC of claim application, however, during pendency of the present writ petition, the claim application itself is decided by the learned Claims Tribunal by its award dated 27.01.2025 and therefore, the present writ petition is now become infructuous and he does not want to press the same. 2. Not opposes by learned counsel for the Respondent No. 1 and 2. 3. On the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is reserve to the petitioner to raise all available grounds in the appropriate proceeding available to him. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika