RUKSANA KOUSER AND ANOTHER v. UT OF J AND K THROUGH SHO BUDHAL AND ANOTHER
CRM(M)/931/2024 · 2026-08-14
Rajesh Sekhri
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 846 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 846 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 931/2024
202
Ruksana Kouser & Anr.
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Mohd. Afsan Khanji, Advocate with Mr. Muzaffar Ali Shah, Advocate.
q
vs
UT of J&K & Anr. .….Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Bhanu Jasrotia, GA.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 14.08.2026
01. Status report stands filed, a perusal whereof reveals that offences under Sections 498-A/323 IPC have been proved only against Khurshid Ahmed, husband of the complainant/respondent no. 2.
02. In view of the above, present petition is dismissed as infructuous along with connected application(s).
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge
Jammu 14.08.2026 Abinash
28