- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:8179 MFA No. 8510 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.8510 OF 2014(MV-I) BETWEEN: SMT.PUSHPA W/O BASAVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, RESIDING AT 4TH CROSS, HOSA, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA - 571 401. …APPELLANT (BY SRI.SIDDALINGE GOWDA.K.G., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI. SANTHOSH P.C. S/O CHANDRASHEKAR, PANAKANAHALLY VILLAGE, KONANAHALLY POST, KASABA HOBL, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO., LTD., NO. 1119/B, M.C.ROAD, MANDYA, MANDYA-571 401. …RESPONDENTS (R1-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; BY SRI. LAKSHMINARASAPPA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. A.M.VENKATESH., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:06.07.2013 Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:8179 MFA No. 8510 of 2014 PASSED IN MVC NO.440/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AND MACT, MANDYA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. Sri.Lakshminarasappa., learned counsel on behalf of Sri.A.M.Venkatesh., for respondent No.2 has appeared through video conferencing. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the captioned appeal was listed on 26.02.2024, on that day, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the appeal was ordered to be listed on 28.02.2024. The Appeal is listed today. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:8179 MFA No. 8510 of 2014 appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Miscellaneous First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51