Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2024 DAILYLAW 829 (KAR)

H RUDRAMUNIYAPPA v. SMT DODDAMMA

RSA/472/2022 · 2026-07-09

V Srishananda

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S KAMAL REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.472 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SRI RUDRAMUNIYAPPA S/O LATE CHIKKA UDDANDAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT JATTI PALYA VILLAGE TAVAREKERE HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU-562130 ...APPELLANT/S (By Sri./Smt : N SRIDHAR AND N ROOPA, ADVOCATES) AND: 1 . SMT. DODDAMMA W/O LATE CHIKKAUDDANDAIAH AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS 2 . SRI MUNIYAPPA S/O LATE SRI CHIKKA UDDANDAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT JATTI PALYA VILLAGE …2 RSA NO. 472/2022 2 TAVAREKERE HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU-562130 3 . SMT. ANITHA @ RADHA W/O SRI NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT KARNATAKA AUTO GARAGE ITI AND KK LAYOUT MAIN ROAD OPPOSITE TO KANYAKUMARI SCHOOL MALLATHHALLI BENGALURU - 560 072 4 . SMT. BUDDAMMA W/O CHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS HAMPAPURA VILLAGE KENGERI HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU-560060 5 . SMT. NAGAMMA W/O SRINIVASA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT 267 2ND MAIN ROAD KAMALANAGARA BENGALURU - 560 079 …3 RSA NO. 472/2022 3 6 . SMT. B S MALA W/O B S PUTTARAJU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS KAVERIPURA PRIYADARSHINI EXTENSION MUDALAPALYA NAGARABHAVI ROAD BENGALURU - 560 072 …RESPONDENT/S THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SEC. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.12.2021 PASSED IN RA.No.66/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.10.2018 PASSED IN OS.No.123/2014 (OLD No.38/2008) ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI. This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order. ORDER The appeal was posted on 31.01.2024 for non compliance of office objections for the fourth time. Two Weeks time was …4 RSA NO. 472/2022 4 granted subject to payment of cost of Rs.1000/-, making it clear that if the office objections are not complied the appeal stands dismissed. The matter is listed today. Office objections are not complied, neither the cost is paid. At the request of the learned counsel for the appellants, two weeks time is granted to comply the office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 24.04.2024, office objections are not complied with, hence appeal shall stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : SR R By : VS C By : RG Ty Dt : 22.06.2024 C.Dt : 24.06.2024