HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 143/2024 CM No. 306/2024 Mansa Ram …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate vs UT of J&K and ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Mr. Divyanshu Malhotra, Advocate vice Mr. Suneel Malhotra, GA Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE ORDER 18.08.2026 1. In terms of order dated 13.10.2025, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 5 was directed to seek instructions, as to whether the respondents are still interested in executing the project at the relevant spot. 2. Mr. Ravinder Gupta, learned AAG has produced a copy of communication dated 16.08.2026, which is taken on record. Perusal of said communication reveals that the scheme has been closed and no work is presently under execution at the site under the said scheme. 3. In view of the above, no further directions are required to be issued, as such, the proceedings in the present petition are closed. 4. Disposed of. (RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE Jammu 18.08.2026 Neha-II Serial No. 21 NEHA KUMARI 2026.08.19 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document