Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Madhya Pradesh · body

2024 DAILYLAW 819 (MP)

RAGHUNANDAN SINGH v. RAJJAN @ MAHENDRA KUMAR

MA/4062/2006 · 2026-03-26

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA ON THE 22nd OF JANUARY, 2024 MISC. APPEAL No. 4062 of 2006 BETWEEN:- RAGHUNANDAN SINGH S/O VISHAWNATH SINGH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, DHAWDA COLONY UMARIYA,DISTT.UMARIYA (MADHYA PRADESH) .....APPELLANT (NONE) AND 1. RAJJAN @ MAHENDRA KUMAR S/O GANESH PRASAD TIWARI, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DRIVER KHALESAR UMARIYA TAH. BANDHAWGARH, THANA AND DISTT UMARIYA (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. SANJAY KUMAR SACHDEV S/O MADHAV DAS SACHDEV, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCCUPATION: OWNER KHALESAR UMARIYA TAH. BANDHAWGARH, THANA AND DISTT UMARIYA (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. BILASHPUR, NEAR BRANCH BUDHAR ROAD, SHAHDOL (MADHYA PRADESH) .....RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI ANCHAN PANDEY - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1) This appeal coming on for orders this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER When the matter came up for hearing on 20.11.2023, no representation on behalf of the appellants and posted the matter under the caption "for 1 Signed by: VIBHA PACHORI Signing time: 24-01-2024 10:25:19 (DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA) JUDGE dismissal". 2. When the matter came up for hearing today, counsel for the appellants neither present nor sought any accommodation on their behalf. In such circumstances, this Court has no option except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. vibha 2 Signing time: 24-01-2024 10:25:19