Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2024 DAILYLAW 816 (KAR)

VENKATAMMA DEAD BY LRS v. SRI B L PRASANNAKUMAR

RSA/1772/2021 · 2026-07-01

V Srishananda

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:23037 RSA No. 1772 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1772 OF 2021 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. VENKATAMMA DEAD BY LRS SRI NAGARAJU S/O LATE BHEEMAIAH AND LATE VENKATAMMA NOW AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 2. SRI RAMESH S/O LATE BHEEMAIAH AND LATE VENKATAMMA NOW AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.284 MASJID ROAD, SARABANDE PALYA SLUMB BANASHANKARI BENGALURU-560070 SHARADAMMA W/O LATE NANJAIAH SINCE DEAD NO LRS …APPELLANTS (BY SRI SUBBA SHASTRY N, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:23037 RSA No. 1772 of 2021 AND: 1. SRI B L PRASANNAKUMAR S/O LATE B J LINGEGOWDA NOW AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RESIDING AT 5TH CROSS, KUVEMPU NAGARA CHANNAPATNA RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562160 2. SMT. CHIKKOLAMMA @ JAYAMMA W/O LATE DASAIAH @ MUGAIAH NOW AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS RESIDING AT KENGAL HANUMANTHANAGARA CHANNPATNA RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562160 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SUMEDH KUMAR M, ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.12.2020 PASSED IN R.A.No.109/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE RAMANAGARA AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R The counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that the legal representatives of the appellant have taken back entire file pertains to the case along with NOC vakalath and also filed acknowledgment for having handed - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:23037 RSA No. 1772 of 2021 over the papers to the legal representatives of the appellant on 07.11.2023. On perusal of the memo, it is clear that the legal representatives of the appellant have taken the NOC along with entire file on 07.11.2023 but till date, not engaged the counsel or appeared before the Court even after lapse of seven months. Hence, the question of granting time once again does not arise. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE SN