Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2024 DAILYLAW 812 (UTT)

MAYANK CHAUDHARY AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C482/359/2024 · 2026-08-13

Siddhartha Sah

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010029972024 C482/359/2024 Mayank Chaudhary And Ors --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. G.S. Lakhchaura, learned counsel for the applicants. 2. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Joshi, learned AGA with Mr. Manoj Bhatt, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, learned counsel for respondent no.2. 4. Mr. Satyaveer Singh Chaudhary, applicant no. 2, is present and is duly identified by his learned counsel. 5. Smt. Itisha Chaudhary, respondent no. 2, is present and is duly identified by her learned counsel. 6. Learned counsel for the applicants, at this stage, submits that since applicant no. 1 and respondent no. 2 have amicably settled their dispute, and the present case arises out of a matrimonial dispute, an oral prayer is being made to amend the prayer clause of the present Criminal Misc. Application so as to incorporate therein the prayer for quashing of the summoning order as well as the entire proceedings of the criminal case. Let the amended prayer clause be filed in the Registry during the course of the day. It is further prayed that the matter may be taken up at the end of the Board. (Siddhartha Sah, J.) 13.08.2026 BS