Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2024 DAILYLAW 802 (UTT)

VINOD BAHUGUNA AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C407/14/2024 · 2026-07-09

Siddhartha Sah

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010072252024 C407/14/2024 Vinod Bahuguna And Anr --Applicants. Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. D. N. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicants. Mr. Siddahrtha Bisht, learned AGA for the State. 2. Mr. D.N. Sharma, Advocate makes a statement that present Criminal Misc. Application has become infructuous, because the trial has been concluded. 3. In view of the above statement, present Criminal Misc. Application (C407 No.14 of 2024) is dismissed as infructuous. (Siddhartha Sah, J.) 09-07-2026 JKJ