Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2024 DAILYLAW 788 (UTT)

ATAR SINGH v. OM PRAKASH

SPLA/496/2024 · 2026-05-30

Ashish Naithani

Criminal Appealbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

21. BA] SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS SPLA No.496 of 2024 With (Delay Condonation Appl. No.02 of 2026) In CRLA No.735 of 2024 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Rajveer Singh, learned counsel for the Applicant appearing through V.C. 2. Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned AGA for the State. 3. Mr. Sanjeev Singh, learned counsel for the Respondents. 4. There is delay of 31 days in filing the instant criminal appeal. The grounds for delay are well explained. Delay is condoned. Accordingly, delay condonation application is allowed. 5. Heard on leave to appeal. 6. Leave to appeal is allowed. 7. Admit. 8. Summon the Trial Court Record. After receipt of the same, Registry is directed to prepare the paper book and supply the same to learned counsel for the parties on payment of usual charges. 9. Let the objection be filed by the State within two weeks. 10. List on 15.07.2026. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 30.05.2026 Arti