GRAM PANCHAYAT LALPUR KALA, v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH,
WPC/5252/2024 · 2026-03-13
Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 787 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 787 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT Judge - Lok Adalat : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Member - Lok Adalat : Mr. Apoorva Tripathi, Advocate WPC No. 5252 of 2024 1 - Gram Panchayat Lalpur Kala, Janpad Panchayat-Kawardha, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) Through Sarpanch Dinesh Kumar Chandravanshi S/o Shri Falit Ram Chandravanshi, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Village-Lalpur Kala, Janpad Panchayat-Kawardha, District-Kabirdham (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Ministry Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantalaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Vikas Bhawan, Ground Floor, North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District-Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector, Kawardha, District-Kabirdham (C.G.) 4 - Chief Executiver Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kawardha, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) 5 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Kawardha, District- Kabirdham (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) Digitally signed by SHAYNA KADRI
2 For Petitioner : Mr. Dinesh Kumar Chandravanshi, Petitioner In-person appeared before this Court For State/Respondents : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, G. A., Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Shah Poyam, C.E.O., Janpad Panchayat, Kabirdham and Mr. Harishankar Chouhan, Deputy Commissioner, Bilaspur. AWARD (Passed on 14/03/2026)
1. The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 19.03.2024 issued by respondent No. 5 directing the petitioner to deposit the amount of the first installment allotted for the construction of the CC Road on the ground that the work had not been commenced. The petitioner has also assailed the letter dated 13.09.2024 issued by respondent No. 4, Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kabirdham, whereby directions have been issued to respondent No. 5, Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Kabirdham, as well as to the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Sahaspur. 2. Today, both the parties filed compromise application stating that the cancelled construction work has been approved under other schemes and the payment for said work has been made from the office of Janpad Panchayat Kawardha. Hence both the parties compromised the dispute amicably and as such nothing remains in this petition for adjudication. 3
3. The contesting parties to this petition have amicably settled/compromised the dispute. We have also found that the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just, proper and legal and hence are acceptable. We accordingly accept the compromise/ settlement, proposed by the parties. 4.
A copy of this compromise/docket arrived at by the parties be made part of this record. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) (Apoorva Tripathi) Judge - Lok Adalat Member - Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Shayna