MUKHTAR AHMAD KHANDAY AND ORS. v. TABASUM MAJEED WANI
CRM(M)/85/2024 · 2026-07-21
Sanjay Dhar
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 781 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 781 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No.34
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) 85/2024 CrlM(222/2024) CrlM(223/2024)
MUKHTAR AHMAD KHANDAY AND ORS. …Petitioner(s)/appellant(s) Through: None
Vs.
TABASUM MAJEED WANI
...Respondent(s) Through: None CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
O R D E R 21-07-2026 None for the petitioners. On the last date of hearing also, no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the petition. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.
Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated.
(SANJAY DHAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 21-07-2026
Aamir
Amir Rashid Sofi I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document