Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2024 DAILYLAW 779 (UTT)

SANJAY RAWAT v. PREM SINGH CHAUHAN

SPLA/43/2024 · 2026-05-15

Ashish Naithani

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2 1 . BA] SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS SPLA No.43 of 2024 With CRLA No.102 of 2024 Sanjay Rawat Vs. Prem Singh Chauhan Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Himanshu Pal, learned counsel for the Appellant. 2. No representation for the Respondent. 3. Present leave to appeal is filed by the appellant against the judgment and order dated 18.12.2023 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Purola, District Uttarkashi in Criminal Case No.315 of 2021 under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. 4. As per office report dated 14.05.2026, notice has been served upon the respondent personally but there is no representation. 5. Heard on leave to appeal. 6. Leave to appeal is allowed. 7. Admit. 8. Lower court record has been received. 9. Since service regarding the respondent considered to be sufficient but there is no representation, in the interest of justice, one opportunity is given to the respondent to file counter affidavit. 10. Let the objection be filed by the respondent within two weeks. 11. List on 07.07.2026. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 15.05.2026 Arti