Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2024 DAILYLAW 779 (KAR)

MR E JACOB v. GUARDIAN SOUHARDA SAHAKARI

WP/56367/2017 · 2026-06-04

M G S Kamal

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:19093 WP No. 56367 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 56367 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. E. JACOB S/O VIJAYARATHINAM ETHAKOTI NO.3200, 7TH MAIN HAL 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR BENGALURU 560 038 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. E. JACOB, PETITIONER ABSENT) AND: GUARDIAN SOUHARDA SAHAKARI BANK NIYAMITA NO.139, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SAILESH S K ., ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT BANK TO FORTHWITH RESTORE THE POSSESSION OF MOVEABLES LOCATED IN THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY, WHICH MOVEABLES WERE ILLEGALLY TAKEN POSSESSIN OF ON 12.4.2017 AS PER THE LIST OF MOVEABLES Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:19093 WP No. 56367 of 2017 VIDE ANNEXURE-J, K,L AND M AND ALSO OF THE OTHER MOVEABLES IN THE SCHEDULE PREMISES THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER On the last date of hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner was permitted to retire from the case, stating that the petitioner has taken back the papers along with NOC. Today when the matter is called out petitioner / party is not present personally or through his counsel. 2. Hence, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE JJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69