OM PARKASH v. UT OF J AND K THROUGH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVT REVENUE DEPTT AND OTHERS
CM(M)/265/2024 · 2026-07-21
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 774 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 774 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- CM(M) No. 265/2024
Om Parkash …..Petitioner
Through :- None
v/s UT of J&K & Ors. .....Respondents
Through :- Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R- 1 to 3 None for R-4 & 5
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 21.07.2026
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 06.07.2026. Today also, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
2. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
3. Interim direction shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 21.07.2026 Sneha Sr. No. 16