IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.26962 of 2024 Subash Kumar Kandi & Ors. …. Petitioners Mr. D.K. Das, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Anr. …. Opposite Parties Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA COROM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 23.02.2026 04. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioners and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “Therefore, it is respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to Admit this Writ Petition, issue rule Nisi for calling upon opp. Parties for show cause as to why the direction will not be issued for regularization of the services of the petitioners as they are have rendered more than 30 years of services. This Hon'ble court be pleased to make its rule absolute if the said opp. Parties fails to submit sufficient cause or show insufficient cause and after hearing from the Parties, this Hon'ble court may direct in the writ of "MANDAMUS" to the opp. Parties particularly opp. Party No.1 to make regularization of the services of the petitioners within a stipulated time for the interest of justice and equity. p. 2 p. 2 This Hon'ble court be pleased to pass any order (s) may direct any direction as this Hon'ble court may deem fit just and proper in this case. And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioners state that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioners have made a representation to Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-4 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-4 in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Jyoti