Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2024 DAILYLAW 754 (UTT)

PAWAN SINGH NEGI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/309/2024 · 2026-02-23

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS ABA No. 309 of 2024 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. None appears for the applicant. 2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Vijay Khanduri and Mrs. Rangoli Purohit, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Narendra Bali, learned counsel for the complainant. 4. Though learned counsel for the applicant is not present, however, Mr. Narendra Bali, learned counsel for the complainant, inform to this court that the present applicant already challenged the proceeding in C528 petition No. 1152 of 2025, wherein, the proceeding have been stayed on 17.07.2025. He also pointed out that another anticipatory bail application No. 291 of 2024 was also dismissed as infructuous since the applicant already filed the petition under section 528 of BNS, 2023. 5. In such view of the matter, since the present applicant already filed a petition under section 528 of BNS, 2023, wherein, the proceeding have already been stayed, therefore, there is no useful purpose to continue the proceeding. 6. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application in view of the statement of Mr. Narendra Bali is dismissed as infructuous. 7. Interim order, if any, is vacated. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 23.02.2026 PR