MUNISH KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA TH MINISTRY OF STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2877/2024 · 2026-07-17
Rajnesh Oswal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 747 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 747 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU, KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2877/2024
Munish Kumar
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Rohit Kotwal, Adv. q
vs
Union of India and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Anishwar Chatterji Koul, CGSC vice Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 17.07.2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been appointed as constable in Central Armed Police Forces(CAPF) as a Constable (General Duty), as such, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Ordered accordingly.
3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner be granted liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available under law for seeking notional benefits vis a vis his subsequent appointment.
4. Needless to say that no such permission is required to the petitioner.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 17.07.2026 Rakesh PS
67 Rakesh Kumar 2026.07.20 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu