Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2024 DAILYLAW 744 (CHH)

SAYYAD NASEEM ALI v. SOURABH MISHRA

CRMP/2941/2024 · 2026-01-26

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2941 of 2024 1 - Sayyad Naseem Ali S/o Sayyad Anwar Ali, Aged About 35 Years (presently) C/o Royal Travels, Shop No. 03, Pagariya Complex, New Bus Stand, Pandari, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - Sourabh Mishra S/o Shri Narendra Mishra R/o Anant Say, Civil Con Private Limited, 255 Second Floor, Progressive Point, Lalpur, P.S. Tikrapara, Raipur (C.G.), Also At Mishra Bada, Near K.P. Travels, Tatyapara, Raipur (C.G.),... (Accused) 2 - State of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents Order Sheet 27-01-2026 Ms. Mamta Jaiswal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vinod Tekam, Govt. Advocate for the State. In view of recent decision of Supreme Court in case of M/s Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc. reported in 2025 INSC 804, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2026.02.10 15:01:25 +0530 2 of present CRMP with liberty to file an Appeal under proviso to Section 372 of CrPC (413 of BNSS) before the appropriate court. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal within a period of 60 days from today before the appropriate court in accordance with law. It is made clear that if such an appeal is filed before the concerned court within the time given, it would not insist upon the limitation while deciding the same and will proceed to decide the matter in accordance with law. Registry shall return the certified copy of the impugned order/judgment and relevant documents to the counsel for the petitioner after retaining photocopy of the same. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil