Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2024 DAILYLAW 733 (UTT)

RAKHI SAINI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BCA/6/2024 · 2026-04-16

Ravindra Maithani

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 28 BCA No. 6 of 2024 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Priyanshu Gairola, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Rakesh Negi, Brief Holder for the State. Ms. Manisha Thakur, Advocate, holding brief of Ms. Chetna Latwal, Advocate for the respondent no.2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the bail cancellation application has rendered infructuous because the respondent no.2 has already been acquitted. In view of the above, the bail cancellation application is dismissed as infructuous. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 16.04.2026 Jitendra