SENIOR DIVISIONAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER v. KAPIL KUMAR
SPLA/210/2024 · 2026-04-09
Ashish Naithani
Criminal Appealbody2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 706 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 706 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
SPLA No.210 of 2024 With CRLA No.251 of 2025 Senior Divisional Security Commissioner Vs. Kapil Kumar and others Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for the Appellant.
2. Mr. Maneesh Bisht, learned counsel for the Respondents.
3. Heard on delay condonation application.
4. There is delay of 329 days in filing the present criminal appeal.
5. The grounds for delay as stated by learned counsel for the appellant is that delay has been caused purely due to procedural formalities, which took so much of time.
6. The reason, so assigned, do not justify the same whereas it would be wise to provide an opportunity of dealing with the present appeal and as such that can be compensated with fine.
7. Delay is condoned. Accordingly, delay condonation application is allowed subject to deposition fine of Rs.10,000/- in the Advocates’ Welfare Fund High Court Bar Association.
8. Leave to appeal is allowed.
9. Admit.
10. Summon the lower court record.
11.
Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted two weeks time to file counter affidavit.
12. Registry is directed to prepare the paper book and supply the same to the concerned parties, as per Rules.
13. List this appeal on 19.05.2026.
(Ashish Naithani, J.)
09.04.2026 Arti