Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2024 DAILYLAW 694 (HP)

ADITI PAPTA v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

CWP/3019/2024 · 2026-06-16

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2024:HHC:1798 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3019 of 2024 Decided on: 16.06.2026 Aditi Papta ….Petitioner Versus Union of India and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Senior Advocate with Ms. Seema Guleria, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondents No. 1 to 3. : Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate with M/s Shradha Karol and Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, Advocates for respondent No. 4. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- “i) That by issuing a writ of mandamus, the respondents may kindly be directed to give appointment offer letter to the petitioner as has been done vis-à-vis other similarly situated outsourced employees. (ii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2024:HHC:1798 decide the representation of the petitioner in contained in Annexure P-3 (colly) in a time bound manner.” 2. Today when the case was taken up for consideration, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent No. 4, on instructions, submitted that without conceding to the contentions raised by the petitioner in the writ petition, as a goodwill gesture, said respondent is offering fresh appointment to the petitioner. He submitted that this should not be treated as a precedent. 3. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the offer is acceptable to the petitioner. 4. In light of this development, this petition is closed without adjudication on merit. It is clarified that the offer that has been made by the private respondent to the petitioner shall not be treated as a precedent. The petitioner shall join duties in terms of the offer contained in the appointment letter latest by 11:00 a.m. on 18.06.2026. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 16, 2026 (narender)