Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.2466 of 2024
Decided on: 05.06.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sukhdev
…..Petitioner
Versus
The State of H.P. and Ors
....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Ms. Nisha Nalot, Advocate vice Ms. Vishvajeet, Advocate for respondent No.3.
Ms. Kanta Devi, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of decision rendered in CWPIL No.22 of 2022 (Court on its own motion Vs. State of H.P.) decided alongwith connected matters on 20.12.2024, more specifically directions issued in para-11 thereof, this writ petition has
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 been rendered infructuous. The writ petition to stand
disposed of accordingly.
Pending application(s), if any, also to stand
disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua June 5, 2026
Judge R.Atal