M/S PRISTINE HOTEL AND RESORT v. SURESH BAJAJ @SK BAJAJ
OMP/308/2026 · 2026-06-05
Sushil Kukreja
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 683 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 683 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
M/s Pristine Hotel and Resort Vs. Suresh Bajaj CS No.52 of 2024 05.06.2026 Present: Ms. Chehak Bhalla, Advocate, vice Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for the plaintiff. Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocates, for the defendant. OMP No.308 of 2026 Learned vice counsel for the non- applicant/plaintiff, under instructions received from Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for the non-applicant/plaintiff, states that she has no objection in case the present application is allowed. Heard. In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and the certified copy of plaint, being Civil Suit No.365/2022, pending before the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Panchkula, is ordered to be taken on record. The application stands disposed of. OMP No.307 of 2026 Heard. In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and the applicant/plaintiff is permitted to place on record the original documents i.e. Annexures P/1, to P/3 and P/6 to P/8. The application stands disposed of.
CS No.52 of 2024 Now, list the case before the Additional Registrar (Judicial) for admission and denial of the additional documents after two weeks. (Sushil Kukreja) Judge 5th June, 2026 (Kiran)