Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2024 DAILYLAW 680 (JK)

ANIL KUMAR AND OTHERS v. PAYAL MAHAJAN

CM(M)/34/2024 · 2026-07-01

Wasim Sadiq Nargal

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CM (M) No. 34/2024 Anil Kumar and others …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs Payal Mahajan .…. Respondent(s) Through: None Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 01.07.2026 1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 24.07.2024 and, thereafter the respondent had granted time to file counter vide order dated 18.09.2024. 2. Today, when the matter was taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. An inference can be drawn that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the instant petition. The same is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 01.07.2026 Nikhil Sr. No. 36