Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CM (M) No. 34/2024
Anil Kumar and others …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
Payal Mahajan .…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 01.07.2026
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 24.07.2024 and, thereafter the respondent had granted time to file counter vide order dated 18.09.2024.
2. Today, when the matter was taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. An inference can be drawn that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the instant petition. The same is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 01.07.2026 Nikhil
Sr. No. 36