GULAM MOHAMMAD BHAT v. SARMAD HAFEEZ AND ANR. (TECHNICAL EDUCATION)
CCP(S)/169/2024 · 2026-06-06
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 662 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 662 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 107 Supplementary Cause List-I
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 169/2024 In WP(C) 1065/2023 Gulam Mohammad Bhat. …Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs. Sarmad Hafeez & Anr. ...Respondent(s) Through:
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 06.06.2026
01. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 2nd June, 2026, and same is the position as on today. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant contempt petition, or that the cause for which the instant contempt petition was filed, may no longer survive.
02. In view of the above, the proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
SRINAGAR: 06.06.2026
“HAMID”