Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2024 DAILYLAW 662 (JK)

GULAM MOHAMMAD BHAT v. SARMAD HAFEEZ AND ANR. (TECHNICAL EDUCATION)

CCP(S)/169/2024 · 2026-06-06

Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 107 Supplementary Cause List-I HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 169/2024 In WP(C) 1065/2023 Gulam Mohammad Bhat. …Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs. Sarmad Hafeez & Anr. ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge. ORDER 06.06.2026 01. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 2nd June, 2026, and same is the position as on today. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant contempt petition, or that the cause for which the instant contempt petition was filed, may no longer survive. 02. In view of the above, the proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge SRINAGAR: 06.06.2026 “HAMID”