SURAJ v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH PRINCIPAL SECY HOME AND ORS
HCP/34/2024 · 2026-05-30
Rahul Bharti
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 649 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 649 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
HCP No. 34/2024
Suraj …..Petitioner
Through: None.
Vs
UT of J&K & Ors. .….Respondents Through: Ms. Nisha Kangotra, Assisting Counsel vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (30.05.2026)
01. During the pendency of the writ petition, the period of detention has been served by the petitioner, rendering the writ petition infructuous, as such, the same is dismissed.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
30.05.2026
Bunty
Serial No. 10 Regular List Bunty Kumar 2026.06.04 17:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document