IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Exe. Pet. No. 238 of 2024 Decided on: 13.05.2026 Sansar Chand and others … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ___________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in the light of the instructions imparted by the respondents, these proceedings can be closed but with the observation that, in case, if according to the petitioner, the judgment has yet not been complied with in letter and spirit, then the petitioner may file fresh execution proceedings for execution that part of the judgment. Accordingly, these proceedings are closed, with liberty as prayed for. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 13, 2026 (narender) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?