Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.10970 of 2024
Decided on 18th May, 2026 Sh. Dayal Krishan
…Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others
…Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional
Advocate General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
When this case was taken up for consideration,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition be
disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court afresh on the issues raised in this petition with further direction to the authorities to decide the representation in light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court now in Surajmani’s case.
2.
As prayed for, the petition is disposed of. The petitioner shall make a fresh representation to the
2 authorities within two weeks, the same be decided within eight weeks thereafter, in light of the contents thereof.
3.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge May 18, 2026 (Vinod)