MOHAMMAD ALTAF HUNDOO v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (LAW AND JUSTICE / GRAMEEN BANK)
WP(C)/657/2024 · 2026-05-13
Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 610 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 610 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 17 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 657/2024 CM (1787/2024)
Mohammad Altaf Hundoo …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s). Through: Mr. M. Amin Khan, Advocate Vs. Union Territory of J and K and Ors
...Respondent(s). Through: Mr. Shakir Haqani, Advocate Ms. Rehana Qayoom, Advocate vice Mr. T.M. Shamsi, DSGI
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 13.05.2026
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is ready to settle his account with the Bank provided he is extended the benefit of OTS Scheme (One Time Settlement Scheme), if any, with the Bank.
2. In view of the aforesaid fair statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to approach the Bank with a proposal for settlement within a period of four weeks from today and the same shall be considered by the Bank and an appropriate decision in accordance with the law taken within four weeks thereafter.
3. For a period of eight weeks, there would no coercive action against the petitioner.
4.
Disposed of.
(SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE
JUDGE SRINAGAR 13.05.2026 Shahid Manzoor