Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Tripura · body

2024 DAILYLAW 61 (TRI)

The State of Tripura and Ors. v. Pankaj Kanti Bhowmik

WA/77/2024 · 2026-02-24

Biswajit Palit

Writ Petition (Civil)body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA _A_G_A_R_T_A_L_A_ W.A.No.77 of 2024 1.The State of Tripura, represented by the Commissioner and Secretary to the Forest Department, Government of Tripura, New Secretariat Complex, Gurkhabasti, Agartala, P.O. Kunjaban, P.S. New Capital Complex, Sub-Division Sadar, District- West Tripura 2.The Chief Secretary, Government of Tripura, New Secretariat Complex, Gurkhabasti, Agartala, P.O. Kunjaban, P.S. New Capital Complex, Sub-Division-Sadar, District West Tripura 3.The Joint Secretary Forest Department, Government of Tripura, New Secretariat Complex, Gurkhabasti, Agartala, P.O. Kunjaban, P.S. New Capital Complex, Sub-Division Sadar, District- West Tripura 4.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Government of Tripura, Aranya Bhavan, Gurkhabasti, P.N. Complex, P.O. Kunjaban, P.S. New Capital Complex, Sub-Division-Sadar, District-West Tripura 5.Sri Balbir Singh, IFS (Retired), the then Inquiring Authority, resident of Flat No.377, Hira Enclave, Sangur Road, Nabha, District-Patiala, Punjab-147201. 6.The Wild Life Warden, Sepahijala Wild Life Santuary, Sepahijala, P.O. and P.S. Bishalgarh, District- Sepahijala Tripura ..........Appellant(s) Versus Pankaj Kanti Bhowmik, son of late Sudhir Ch. Bhowmik, resident of Dhaleswar Road No.14/8, P.O. Dhaleshwar, P.S. East Agartala, District- West Tripura, PIN- 799007 ..........Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mangal Debbarma, Addl. G.A. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suman Bhattacharjee, Advocate. Mr. Prasenjit Shil, Advocate. HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT =O=R=D=E=R= 24/02/2026 This Writ Appeal is preferred against the judgment dt. 15.03.2024 of the Learned Single Judge in WP(C)No.320 of 2023. After matter was heard for a couple of occasions, the counsel for the Writ Petitioner/Respondent in the Writ Appeal states that the Writ Petitioner seeks to withdraw the Writ Petition itself. In view of the said submission, the Writ Appeal is disposed of recording that the counsel for the Respondent has withdrawn WP(C)320 of 2023 itself. Consequently, the Writ Appeal is infructuous. Pending application/s, if any, also stands disposed of. (BISWAJIT PALIT, J) (M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, CJ) Sabyasachi B SABYASACHI BHATTACHA RJEE Digitally signed by SABYASACHI BHATTACHARJEE Date: 2026.02.26 15:06:16 +05'30'