IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No. 2024 of 2017 Decided on: 08.05.2026 ____________________________________________________ Prince ……….. petitioner Versus Director General Defence Estates and another ……….respondents ____________________________________________________ Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner : Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate. . For the respondents : Mr. Balram Sharma, DSGI, with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate. ____________________________________________________ Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous on account of subsequent developments. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge 8th May, 2026 tarun 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?